<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMworld 2008 : The ugly secrets of Microsoft SVVP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.lemagit.fr/2008/09/18/vmworld-2008-the-ugly-secrets-of-microsoft-svvp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.lemagit.fr/2008/09/18/vmworld-2008-the-ugly-secrets-of-microsoft-svvp/</link>
	<description>Les blogs de la rédaction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:43:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft support for VMware ESX still limited&#187; טכנו-ביסים (techno-bites)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.lemagit.fr/2008/09/18/vmworld-2008-the-ugly-secrets-of-microsoft-svvp/comment-page-1/#comment-5830</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft support for VMware ESX still limited&#187; טכנו-ביסים (techno-bites)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.lemagit.fr/?p=1590#comment-5830</guid>
		<description>[...] this LeMagIT took the disturb to dig more into this last achievement and discovered something [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this LeMagIT took the disturb to dig more into this last achievement and discovered something [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hypervisor.fr &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ESX 3.5u2 supporté par Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://blogs.lemagit.fr/2008/09/18/vmworld-2008-the-ugly-secrets-of-microsoft-svvp/comment-page-1/#comment-5416</link>
		<dc:creator>hypervisor.fr &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ESX 3.5u2 supporté par Microsoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.lemagit.fr/?p=1590#comment-5416</guid>
		<description>[...] 08/10/2008 : L&#8217;inquiétude autour de l&#8217;article posté sur le blog de LeMagIT.fr vient de retomber grâce à une mini FAQ posté sur le blog de Chad Sakac, EMC Senior [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 08/10/2008 : L&#8217;inquiétude autour de l&#8217;article posté sur le blog de LeMagIT.fr vient de retomber grâce à une mini FAQ posté sur le blog de Chad Sakac, EMC Senior [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeMagIT Blogs : ESX Server et Microsoft : une validation bien incomplète</title>
		<link>http://blogs.lemagit.fr/2008/09/18/vmworld-2008-the-ugly-secrets-of-microsoft-svvp/comment-page-1/#comment-5220</link>
		<dc:creator>LeMagIT Blogs : ESX Server et Microsoft : une validation bien incomplète</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.lemagit.fr/?p=1590#comment-5220</guid>
		<description>[...] l&#8217;occasion de VMworld 2008, j&#8217;ai écrit un petit papier de blog en anglais expliquant que VMware est loin d&#8217;avoir globalement validé ESX Server dans le cadre du Server [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] l&#8217;occasion de VMworld 2008, j&#8217;ai écrit un petit papier de blog en anglais expliquant que VMware est loin d&#8217;avoir globalement validé ESX Server dans le cadre du Server [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeMagIT Blogs : More on Microsoft, VMware and the SVVP</title>
		<link>http://blogs.lemagit.fr/2008/09/18/vmworld-2008-the-ugly-secrets-of-microsoft-svvp/comment-page-1/#comment-5218</link>
		<dc:creator>LeMagIT Blogs : More on Microsoft, VMware and the SVVP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 16:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.lemagit.fr/?p=1590#comment-5218</guid>
		<description>[...] recently wrote in a post that VMware still has a very limited set of configurations officially validated under [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently wrote in a post that VMware still has a very limited set of configurations officially validated under [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VMware Clarifies Microsoft SVVP Validation Status &#124; VM /ETC</title>
		<link>http://blogs.lemagit.fr/2008/09/18/vmworld-2008-the-ugly-secrets-of-microsoft-svvp/comment-page-1/#comment-4804</link>
		<dc:creator>VMware Clarifies Microsoft SVVP Validation Status &#124; VM /ETC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.lemagit.fr/?p=1590#comment-4804</guid>
		<description>[...] from Scott Lowe&#8217;s post VMware ESX SVVP Apparently Limited. Scott wrote: &#8220;According to this article, the validation is handled per CPU architecture, per memory configuration. So, apparently VMware [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from Scott Lowe&#8217;s post VMware ESX SVVP Apparently Limited. Scott wrote: &#8220;According to this article, the validation is handled per CPU architecture, per memory configuration. So, apparently VMware [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenon Owens</title>
		<link>http://blogs.lemagit.fr/2008/09/18/vmworld-2008-the-ugly-secrets-of-microsoft-svvp/comment-page-1/#comment-4775</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenon Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.lemagit.fr/?p=1590#comment-4775</guid>
		<description>VMware has sent some clarification out to their sales team about what this means, and has asked me to pass on the information to you.

http://dantedog29.blogspot.com/2008/09/what-deal-with-svvp.html

Basically, the 4GB of RAM is set for the size of the VM, NOT for the size of the physical box, and we are in the process of certifying ESX Server 3.5 as well as ESXi 3.5 to support the maximum amount of RAM that those products will support within a VM and also on both Intel and AMD processors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VMware has sent some clarification out to their sales team about what this means, and has asked me to pass on the information to you.</p>
<p><a href="http://dantedog29.blogspot.com/2008/09/what-deal-with-svvp.html" rel="nofollow">http://dantedog29.blogspot.com/2008/09/what-deal-with-svvp.html</a></p>
<p>Basically, the 4GB of RAM is set for the size of the VM, NOT for the size of the physical box, and we are in the process of certifying ESX Server 3.5 as well as ESXi 3.5 to support the maximum amount of RAM that those products will support within a VM and also on both Intel and AMD processors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VMWare Has Very Limited SVVP Support From Microsoft Right Now &#124; Virtualization Information</title>
		<link>http://blogs.lemagit.fr/2008/09/18/vmworld-2008-the-ugly-secrets-of-microsoft-svvp/comment-page-1/#comment-4728</link>
		<dc:creator>VMWare Has Very Limited SVVP Support From Microsoft Right Now &#124; Virtualization Information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 03:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.lemagit.fr/?p=1590#comment-4728</guid>
		<description>[...] was looking over RSS feeds and found a question by Scott Lowe that was referencing a blog from LeMagIT called &#8220;The Ugly Secrets of Microsoft SVVP.  It appears that VMWare ESX is only SVVP [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was looking over RSS feeds and found a question by Scott Lowe that was referencing a blog from LeMagIT called &#8220;The Ugly Secrets of Microsoft SVVP.  It appears that VMWare ESX is only SVVP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VMware ESX SVVP Validation Apparently Limited - blog.scottlowe.org - The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.lemagit.fr/2008/09/18/vmworld-2008-the-ugly-secrets-of-microsoft-svvp/comment-page-1/#comment-4727</link>
		<dc:creator>VMware ESX SVVP Validation Apparently Limited - blog.scottlowe.org - The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 02:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.lemagit.fr/?p=1590#comment-4727</guid>
		<description>[...] last week, though, I learned that Microsoft&#8217;s validation may be quite limited. According to this article, the validation is handled per CPU architecture, per memory configuration. So, apparently VMware [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last week, though, I learned that Microsoft&#8217;s validation may be quite limited. According to this article, the validation is handled per CPU architecture, per memory configuration. So, apparently VMware [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
